31 soldiers to join UN observers in early summer
By Chris Wattie

March 25, 2005
By: Pat Johnson
The next chapter of activism
Canadian Jewish Congress re-examines what defines a "Jewish issue."
What is a "Jewish issue"? That is a question that has been facing Canada's Jewish communal agencies for decades, but with changes to the national infrastructure of Jewish communal life, the answer is about to get a lot broader.
Bernie Farber, the new chief executive officer of Canadian Jewish Congress, was in Vancouver recently, laying some of the groundwork for a major redirection of his organization's agenda.
The changes are partly a result of the massive adjustment made in recent years to the structure of Jewish life in Canada. The national organizations that make up much of the Jewish community's institutional presence are now united under the umbrella of the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA).
Though best know for fighting anti-Semitism, Canadian Jewish Congress has long been involved in a vast array of parallel and seemingly unrelated issues. In Ontario, where Farber was until January the executive director of the regional CJC office, the organization has already become one of the leading advocates for children living in poverty. That's an example Farber wants to emulate at the national level.
To do this, Farber aims to build better alliances with the various Jewish federations in Canada. Already, groups like the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver are deeply involved in issues of poverty and affordable housing. While federations do much of the "on the ground" work on issues like these, CJC, as the country's primary and oldest lobbying group, will now more actively take up the charge in pressing governments and other decision-makers to respond to issues of social justice that go beyond what would traditionally have been dubbed "Jewish issues."
"Congress is best situated to do the professional advocacy for the community because we've been doing it for almost 100 years," Farber told the Bulletin March 15. "What we haven't focused on are the kinds of issues that are vital to federations. In Ontario, we have. We have for the last number of years worked on issues like child welfare, elder care, social housing. What I want to do is transport that concept into other areas across the country so that Congress develops the kind of expertise that's needed."
Though CJC has long been involved in a range of issues, this is a rallying cry for a host of new initiatives, Farber said.
"I would say it's a new chapter of activism," said Farber.
Back to the question of what is a Jewish issue, Farber replied, any issue that you consider a Jewish issue is a Jewish issue.
"For example, when people say to me, how is child poverty a Jewish issue? Well, it's a Jewish issue because there are Jewish children who are poor. And even if there weren't, all these issues are human issues," he said. CJC's priorities are not just self-interest, but the larger Jewish imperative of tikkun olam, the repair of the world, he said.
"If there is a mission for Congress, that's what it is: to help repair the world," he said.
With a streamlined national umbrella, increased funding and the unification of national lobbying efforts, Farber believes CJC can do more than ever.
"We have a brand name, people expect good work of us and usually we don't let them down," he said. His goals include having a full-time lobbyist on Parliament Hill and, eventually, similar individuals in provincial capitals.
Farber cited the work of Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region, as a model for future national endeavors.
"People look to the Jewish community to be a leader on those issues," said Farber. "For example, here in the Pacific region, Mark Weintraub [the regional chair] and a number of our leadership here in the Pacific region are really leading on the matter of Darfur. Not, by the way, just in Canada. They are being recognized literally around the world as a strong advocate [for] dealing with his terrible genocide that's going on three-quarters of the way around the world. That's not a Jewish issue per se, but it is a Jewish issue because, of all people, we understand what it is to be victimized like this and to be killed in such numbers. It is an example of the kinds of thing that I want to see."
Though CJC can be expected to speak out more forcefully on things that do not seem like traditional "Jewish issues," the old standbys are not going to disappear, Farber said. Anti-Semitism, to the surprise and dismay of the Jewish community, has proved enduring and adaptive.
"We understand that anti-Semitism is different today than it was 10, even 15 years ago," he said. "It is one of the most redoubtable of viruses that finds a host and can mutate in any kind of a way."
A surprising and disappointing development, he said, is the emergence of anti-Semitism in the anti-Zionist movement of the left.
"Much of what we're seeing today in relation to this anti-Zionism bleeding into anti-Semitism is happening as much on the extreme left as it is on the extreme right and sometimes even on the centre-left," said Farber.
"In the past, we knew who our enemies were," he said, citing white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis. "We fought them arm-in-arm with the trade union movement, with people on the left. They were our soldiers on the road to dealing with these issues. Something happened along the road. We lost sight of each other. We went down separate paths."
One of the priorities of CJC is to rebuild bridges and co-operation with the left in Canada.
"We have to find a way to be back there, even if we passionately disagree with each other," he said. "Friends can passionately disagree with each other, but we have to be there to put Israel's best face forward, to help people understand that there are two sides to every issue."
Working with police, hate crimes units, Internet service providers (ISPs) and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, CJC has helped identify and shut down many web-based hate sites, often simply by appealing to the goodwill of the ISP.
CJC officials are also working on an anti-Semitism awareness program for school curricula, beginning in Ontario but intended to spread across Canada.
All of these efforts might give the impression that CJC is taking a more vigilant political orientation. Not so, said Farber.
"I don't see this as political," he said. "I really see this as human rights matters."
http://www.cjc.ca/template.php?action=itn&Story=1237
CJC, Pacific Region Launches Ambitious Three-Year Agenda
March 19, 2005
By: Mary Vallis
UN fails to deter Sudan genocide
The photo opportunities have ended, the official statements have been read, the foreign politicians have flown off in their jets and the Arab militias in Darfur have been left to get on with the slaughter.
Months after a parade of celebrities and Western leaders visited Sudan to express distress over a crisis that is killing thousands a month, little has changed. The militias have not been reined in, the Sudanese government is being as unco-operative as ever, and the death toll is escalating.
This week the United Nations calculated 180,000 have died in the western region of Sudan.That is more than double the previous estimate. The Security Council, after lengthy debate, is locked in a stalemate, while China blocks sanctions to avoid hurting its oil interests.
Just four months ago, Paul Martin, the Prime Minister, flew to Sudan and warned President Omar al-Bashir that his Arab-dominated government must rein in the janjaweed militia, which has spread a campaign of terror through non-Arab villages in Darfur.
"The President indicated with us that he was not able to control the janjaweed. That ... they were operating on their own," the Prime Minister told reporters during his brief stopover. "The point we made to him is that we expect the janjaweed would be controlled. Period."
He was only one of a number of visiting Westerners.
"All of us have watched with concern and alarm at the death, disease and destruction that has come to Darfur," British Prime Minister Tony Blair declared during his visit last fall.Colin Powell, then U.S. secretary of state, walked the dusty paths of a refugee camp and voiced American resolve to ensure something was done. Even Angelina Jolie, the UN's goodwill ambassador, comforted children ripped from their homes.
But the situation has not improved. Indeed, it is worse."There are a lot of people in camps still effectively imprisoned because it's too dangerous to go out of the sites that they're sheltering in -- they are scared they'll get attacked or raped or beaten or killed," Jo Nickolls, an Oxfam worker, said over a crackling telephone line from Khartoum yesterday. "The situation has not improved. It's a massive-scale crisis. People are going to be increasingly dependent on external assistance."
Jan Egeland, the UN emergency relief co-ordinator, said this week the death toll has been about 10,000 a month since October, 2003. The number includes death from starvation and disease, but reportedly not those slain by militias. Close to two million people have been driven from their homes. Meanwhile, the UN was forced to pull its foreign staff out of parts of Darfur this week after the janjaweed threatened to target foreigners and humanitarian convoys.Mr. Egeland stressed his latest figures are only rough estimates. Other international observers say the death toll could be much higher.
Eric Reeves, a professor at Smith College in Northampton, Mass., who independently produces some of the most comprehensive death-toll estimates for Sudan, said his latest analysis indicates more than 380,000 people have died in Darfur since the conflict began in 2003 -- far more than the UN figures suggest, and approaching half the number believed to have died in the Rwanda genocide a decade ago. He said the international community must immediately send troops."Under the circumstances, the only way to prevent ongoing genocidal destruction is to protect civilians acutely at risk. That can be accomplished only by military means at this point," Mr. Reeves said.
But the UN Security Council is bickering over which court should punish Darfur's war criminals, should they ever be arrested. The United States is opposed in principle to the International Criminal Court, established by the UN in 2002 to try such cases. It wants the killers to appear before the UN special tribunal in Tanzania, which was set up to deal with the perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide.
The United States accused the Sudanese government and the janjaweed of genocide last September, citing a report with 1,100 refugees that found 61% had witnessed the slaying of a family member.
However, Russia and China are also blocking sanctions against Sudan because of their own interests. Russia sells arms to Sudan, while China is a major consumer of the African nation's oil.
While the diplomats squabble, the task of policing Darfur, an area roughly the size of France, has been left to 2,200 poorly equipped African Union troops who do not have a mandate to protect civilians. The number is well below the 3,400 the African Union was scheduled to deploy and represents about a quarter the number the UN says is necessary.
"The bottom line is this: The UN is failing. The African Union is doing something, but it's underfunded, it's untrained," said Mark Weintraub, chairman of the Canadian Jewish Congress's Darfur committee. "There are thousands and thousands of Canadians who care about this issue. They do not want, five years from now, to be watching the movie Hotel Darfur," Mr. Weintraub said, referring to the recent film Hotel Rwanda about the Rwandan genocide.
The crisis in Darfur began in February, 2003, after two non-Arab rebel groups began fighting the Arab-dominated government for greater power and resources. International observers allege the Sudanese government responded by arming the janjaweed.
The government in Khartoum admitted arming some militia, but denies any links to the janjaweed, insisting they are outlaws."For countries to simply be in a state of paralysis -- or worse, be leaving Darfur -- sends a terrible signal to the janjaweed militia that the world doesn't care," said Stockwell Day, the Conservative party's foreign affairs critic. "I don't even want to think what the ramifications of that will be."
On Thursday, Mr. Day sent a request to Mr. Martin and Pierre Pettigrew, the Foreign Affairs Minister, urging the Canadian government and the international community to "show a presence" in Darfur.
"'I'm glad the Prime Minister was over there last year. He was only in Khartoum for 10 hours," Mr. Day said from Montreal on Thursday. "Now back up that 10 hours with some hard work pulling together a multilateral group that will simply go in there and be a deterring presence.""The response to the tsunami has shown how much people can care about remote crises around the world," said Ms. Nickolls, the aid worker. "We need to make sure people are aware of the severity of what's happening in Darfur, because it isn't going to go away."
COUNTDOWN TO GENOCIDE
African farmers in Darfur, western Sudan, have a long history of clashes over land with Arab pastoralists:
1994 Khartoum gives Arab groups new positions of power.
1998-99 Hostilities break out in West Darfur when Arab nomads begin moving south with their flocks earlier than usual.
1999 First attacks from government-supported Arab militias, dubbed janjaweed.
FEBRUARY, 2003 Fighting breaks out between government forces and the rebel groups Sudan Liberation Army and Justice & Equality Movement after rebels demand a share in power.
APRIL The first refugees begin arriving in Chad as janjaweed start a reign of terror, raping, killing and pillaging; others flee within Darfur.
SEPTEMBER 65,000 refugees in Chad; UN estimates 500,000 people need humanitarian aid.
DECEMBER UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan expresses alarm at human rights violations. About 100,000 refugees are now in Chad, but the number continues to grow daily.
FEBRUARY, 2004 Khartoum agrees to give aid workers better access to Darfur.
MARCH For the first time, the UN says that what is happening in Darfur is genocide and compares it with Rwanda in 1994.
APRIL Ceasefire signed between Khartoum and rebels.
MAY UN calls Darfur the world's worst humanitarian crisis, estimating one million people have been displaced; the number of refugees in Chad tops 120,000; the Security Council calls on Khartoum to disarm the janjaweed.
JUNE UN estimates two million people have been displaced and says the campaign of genocide is continuing.
JULY Sudan pledges to disarm janjaweed and bring those responsible for human rights abuse to justice. Nothing else changes, leading the Security Council to adopt a resolution paving the way for action against Sudan and giving Khartoum a deadline of Aug. 30.
SEPTEMBER UN envoy says Sudan has not met targets for disarming janjaweed and must accept outside help to protect civilians. Then-U.S. secretary of state Colin Powell calls Darfur killings genocide.
NOVEMBER Security Council meeting in Nairobi fails to pass a resolution imposing any sanctions on Darfur combatants.
JANUARY, 2005 Security Council commission reports serious violations of international law have occurred in Darfur and recommends referral to the International Criminal Court. Between 180,000 and 380,000 civilians are estimated to have died.
By PAUL LUNGEN
Staff Reporter
Canadian Jewish Congress is calling on the government of Canada to follow up its earlier pledges to help protect the residents of Darfur, Sudan from an “unfolding tragedy” that has already claimed 300,000 lives.
In a letter to Prime Minister Paul Martin, Congress urged the prime minister to make good on the “responsibility to protect” guidelines – which would give the international community the right to intervene in Sudan to prevent gross violation of human rights – that Martin has previously advocated.
“We trust that all necessary further steps will be implemented forthwith to ensure a successful Canadian foreign policy as it relates to Darfur. We also know from our advocacy work that many Canadians await with great anticipation the speedy enactment of an effective strategy, which will help protect the millions of innocents whose lives are at risk, while simultaneously bringing credit to us as a nation impelled by conscience,” states the letter from Mark Weintraub, chair of Congress’ national Darfur committee.
Following the NATO summit in Brussels recently, Martin said Canada was prepared to take part in an international force in Sudan. “We are prepared to do whatever is required, but we cannot simply sit by and watch what is happening in Darfur continue,” he said at the time.
Martin discussed the Darfur situation with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and hinted that Canada would support United Nations efforts to establish a UN peacekeeping force in the Sudanese territory.
Weintraub, however, said the UN route appears to be stalled.
“Notwithstanding the efforts of Canadian and others, the [UN] Security Council seems no closer to taking effective action to provide protection to the people so tragically affected,” his letter stated.
In a telephone interview from Vancouver, Weintraub suggested Russia, China and Algeria were blocking a proposed UN peacekeeping force. While Canada can’t overcome these roadblocks alone, it can shine a spotlight on these countries for obstructing action on Darfur, he said.
The international community must do something to prevent genocide in Darfur, whether under UN auspices or as part of a NATO operation, he continued.
“We don’t have the final answer here. We have skilled people in Ottawa and we need to have the political will to say, we are going to find a political solution here. This has got to be doable.”
The Jewish community in particular must lend its support to Canadian efforts to end the Darfur genocide, he continued.
The phrase “never again” must apply to all people, and Jews and Canadians face an “ethical imperative” to speak out against mass murder. “We don’t want to add Darfur to the list of genocides in five years and be watching Hotel Darfur (a reference to Hotel Rwanda, a film about the 1994 murder of Tutsis in that African state) in five years,” he said.
“For our own internal credibility, we have an ethical imperative here,” he said.
Congress has been urging the government for at least a year to take a leading role to end the crisis in Darfur. It is also calling on the Jewish community to lobby their MPs and other decision-makers on the issue.
Congress is sponsoring a national Purim petition that will be delivered to the government and it is working with rabbis to formulate a Passover program that might be included at seders to highlight the crisis in Darfur.
“The greatest response we’ve received is from the Holocaust survivor community, as this community wants to know their suffering was not in vain,” Weintraub added.
http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=5816

March 7, 2005 - 11:49 pm
News 1130 AM All News Radio
Marijuana party candidate upsets Canadian Jewish Congress
Niki Upton/Tamiko Nicholson
News1130 chose not to air the possibly contentious comments until playing the tape for the Canadian Jewish Congress. Chair Mark Weintraub says the analogy is extreme and that it almost amounts to holocaust denial in the sense that such a comparison completely trivializes the destruction of an entire ancient civilization. He says it is inappropriate to compare genocide to criminal law.


February 4, 2005
Shoah lesson for Sudan
Now is the time to scream, says Holocaust survivor.
PAT JOHNSON
"In the dark, in the bunks before falling asleep, I remember listening to some of the inmates who were important men before the war – learned, intelligent, politicians, writers and philosophers. They were there because they were against the Nazis," Waisman said last week on the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the death camp Auschwitz. "Their conversations gave me hope. I was a teenager. They believed anyone lucky enough to survive would live in paradise – no more war, no more hunger. That resonated within me, I wanted to live in that kind of world. I wanted to survive."
Waisman did survive, but his dreams, as well as those of other inmates, of a world without human-made atrocities, did not. Next to him at a table in the Jewish Community Centre of Greater Vancouver Jan. 27 was Nouri Abdalla, a British Columbian who is a representative of the Darfurian community in Canada.
In Darfur, a region in the northeast African country of Sudan, armed militias and Sudanese government soldiers are perpetrating atrocities. The United Nations is debating whether the violence there should be called "genocide."
About 1.6 million people have been forced from their homes in Darfur, some escaping to neighboring Chad, but most displaced internally, without adequate food, water or shelter. About 70,000 have been killed, with hundreds of thousands more in immediate peril. As many as 12,000 villages have been burned in their entirety. Thousands of women have been raped, thousands of children have been abducted. International aid organizations say more than three million people in Darfur – half the population – are completely dependent on relief aid.
Waisman and Abdalla were speaking at a news conference convened by Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region, to mark the anniversary of Auschwitz's liberation but also to draw attention anew to the crisis in Darfur.Abdalla echoed Waisman's warning that the world must not avert its eyes again when it sees genocide looming.
"The world community has not learned at all from past experiences with regard to genocidal acts going back to World War Two, through Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, and now we have a genocide standing tall in Darfur and it seems like nobody is doing anything about it, to stop it," said Abdalla. "The situation in Darfur today is worse than what it was six or seven months ago when the [United Nations] Security Council had actually started to intervene to stop the genocide, the mass killing, the mass raping and the mass abducting of children and the burning of villages in the Darfur region of Sudan."
In July 2004, the security council passed a resolution asking the Sudanese government to disarm the Janjaweed militias, which had been operating independently, but with the approval and active support of the Sudanese government. Although the Sudanese government maintains it is not directly involved in the conflict, evidence refutes this. Darfurian villages are being bombed from the air, said Abdalla, and the Sudanese government is the only entity in the conflict with air power.
"Unfortunately, what the Sudanese government has done since then is incorporated those Janjaweed militias, or members of the Janjaweed militias, into its paramilitary forces," said Abdalla. "It's incorporated them into their regular armed forces and now they're working with even more impunity in Darfur than ever."
Though the UN approved the intervention of 3,300 African Union troops in Darfur – a fraction of the number Darfurians and others say are needed – only 1,200 have been deployed and those are only observing. They are not empowered to intervene on behalf of endangered civilians.
"The intervention up to date is simply not working at all," said Abdalla. "What the security council is doing in Darfur is absolutely not working."
Reportedly, last week government troops raided civilian villages and government planes bombed three more Darfur villages.
"It has been such a great comfort for those of us who are Darfurians living here in Canada to see the Canadian government taking the lead. We have definitely been able to count on the prime minister to raise this issue to the highest level."
Abdalla commended Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin – one of the few world leaders to press the issue onto the international agenda – but urged the government and ordinary Canadians to do more.
"We are certainly looking for more from our government and from the prime minister," Abdalla said. He urges the international community to demand the immediate imposition of a no-fly zone over Darfur, an arms embargo against the Sudanese government and the complete disbanding of the Janjaweed.
"Without doing that, there is no end that I can see," said Abdalla.
Mark Weintraub, chair of Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region, said his organization has sent a second letter to the Canadian prime minister. It acknowledges the actions by Canada and calls on the government to "mobilize all resources – political, diplomatic and financial" to stop the suffering and prevent a genocide.
He urged Canadians to keep the issue at the top of the Canadian agenda by calling or writing politicians.
"Our message to the larger Canadian community is that we know Canadian leadership is deeply troubled by Darfur, but there are many issues with which our politicians are engaged and it is vital that Canadians speak out so our decision-makers know that many Canadians want and expect powerful leadership on this issue," said Weintraub.Reflecting on the echoes of history, Waisman compared the near-silence of the contemporary world on Darfur to the silence of the world as the Final Solution unfolded.
"My eyes have seen unimaginable horrors. I'm a witness to the ultimate evil. I'm a witness to man's inhumanity to other humans," Waisman said."I represent one and a half million Jewish children who perished in the Holocaust and no one protested. The world remained silent," said Waisman. "Today, we have instant communication. There's no excuse for silence. I cannot understand why so many people with good intentions, with all the evil around them, choose to look the other way. We must not let it happen again.
"What do we need to do to finally learn the lesson and look out for one another?" he asked. "Now is the time to speak out. Now is the time to scream."
Pat Johnson is a B.C. journalist and commentator.
http://www.jewishindependent.ca/Archives/Feb05/archives05Feb04-01.html
Feb 02, 2005 - CJC seeks action from Prime Minister on Darfur 
January 28, 2005
No charges for Miracle
CJC is disappointed, but has faith in judicial process.
PAT JOHNSON
The publisher of a local Muslim newspaper that ran a viciously anti-Semitic article will not face charges. The Miracle, a Delta-based publication, had reprinted a litany of anti-Jewish accusations, blaming "the jews" (sic) for the attacks on the World Trade Centre, two world wars, the Depression, the assassination of John F. Kennedy and another 83 similar assertions.
The Crown announced last week, following a year of investigation, that the case would not be recommended for criminal charges for the wilful promotion of hatred.
Nusrat Hussain, the publisher of the Miracle, said he is relieved and he condemned the article that he ran Dec. 26, 2003. The article was a reprint of an anti-Semitic tract making the rounds via the Internet. It was written by Edgar J. Steele, a disbarred lawyer from Idaho."I had apologized and I was very clear about it, for the article was offensive," Hussain told the Bulletin last week. "I had never said that I was in favor of the article or I agreed. On the contrary, I was very clear. I condemned the article. But I was doing a different line. I was defending the freedom of speech."Canadian laws regarding the promotion of hatred rest on the intent of the speaker or publisher of allegedly hateful comments. Hussain compares the standard of intent to the difference between murder and accidental death.
"There's a difference if you murder a person [or] if somebody is killed under your car by accident," he said. "Although in the end it is the death of a person, you have to prove the intentions.
"The intention was never to promote hate in this case," he said.
Though he is pleased with the outcome, Hussain said the experience has been wrenching. He was hospitalized with a heart ailment for five days last February, shortly after the investigation began.
"I have suffered in my business also," he said. "I lost advertisers. I lost reputation. Politically, there were senators, a member of Parliament, a member of the legislature, who were writing for my newspaper. All of them withdrew."
The publisher sees a silver lining in the incident, though, citing what he says is a growth in dialogue between the Jewish and Muslim communities as a result of the issue and its surrounding publicity.
"There were positive things," said Hussain. "The Jewish and Muslim communities – the interaction which has started now – it was unheard of [before]. The people in my community would not like to listen about the Jewish community, the same way, I'm sure it was, on the other side. But this is a very positive thing that is happening. People are talking to each other. They are sitting together and talking about each other's views and listening to each other and that is, I believe, required."Canadian Jewish Congress, which brought the article to the attention of police, said the decision not to proceed to criminal charges does not diminish the harm done by the article.
"It has to be understood that, even though the Crown did not proceed with charges, the fact that something as anti-Semitic and as destructive as what was contained in that piece was published in our community created extreme distress for us," said Mark Weintraub, chair of Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region. "The Jewish community and the larger community should not have to be subjected to such vile propaganda. It has to be understood that simply expressing regret really doesn't go to the heart of the damage that is done when we have to continually deal with these terrible attacks on Jews."
Weintraub said that his organization sees no silver lining in hateful remarks, though he hopes the incident opened some eyes."We were heartened by many comments and expressions of empathy and sympathy and support from Muslim leaders," said Weintraub. "We have had excellent relations in the past with many segments of the Muslim community, so we did not need these kinds of expressions of anti-Semitism to bring our communities closer. What has occurred has perhaps made certain segments of the Muslim community aware that there are individuals in their community who hold views that are intolerant and really have no place in our community."Because it was the complainant in the case, Canadian Jewish Congress was verbally briefed on the decision by Crown not to proceed with charges. CJC has requested a copy of the Crown's written report, but Weintraub said he does not know if they are entitled to it.
"The Crown has to make a determination as to whether there is a likelihood of conviction and that it's in the public interest," explained Weintraub, who is a Vancouver lawyer. "Not every action that appears to be a crime always results in prosecution. The Crown does have discretion."
A decision not to go to charges can be based simply on likelihood of conviction and does not necessarily imply that the article was not hateful."The verbal summary was to the effect that the statements that were published were anti-Semitic," said Weintraub. "They could be construed as hate-filled. However, the means of the publication of these statements, which were a republication of an American anti-Semite in this particular newspaper, meant that it was not necessarily likely that the incitement-to-hate provisions of the Criminal Code would have been breached, because there are certain technical and procedural requirements to prove intent to incite and because of the mode of republication. The Crown was not satisfied that they would be able to meet the test."
Weintraub said he is satisfied that the investigation was thorough and his organization did the right thing in bringing it to the attention of the police.
"To our minds, we were satisfied that we had acted appropriately by turning this over to the Crown, because it was deemed to be highly anti-Semitic," he said. "But, at that point, we have to let the justice system take its course. We have advocated over the years for a highly specialized hate crime team. We have been successful in that regard and we think that there are very competent people in that hate crime team who understand the technicalities of the law and, if they considered that a charge should not be proceeded with, while we are disappointed, we have confidence in the process and in the judicial system. As far as we're concerned, we saw a crime, we acted appropriately, we co-operated with the authorities and we continue to have confidence in our judicial system."
CJC is awaiting a decision on whether charges will come in another prominent British Columbia case under investigation by the Hate Crime Team. Last year, Sheik Younus Kathrada, a Vancouver imam, made international headlines when tapes of the Muslim religious leader's comments, in which he referred to Jews as "the brothers of monkeys and swine" and called on Muslims to kill Jews, were made public. The case is under investigation by RCMP.
CJC has used the two incidents to repeat requests that the province fully fund the Hate Crime Team, a specialized group of police, Crown counsel and support staff that saw its funding sharply cut under provincial cost-saving measures. Premier Gordon Campbell has promised to restore funding for the body, which has been reduced to one RCMP officer, but the money has not been forthcoming. Observers expect funding may be provided in the budget before this May's provincial election.
Pat Johnson is a B.C. journalist and commentator.